Furthermore, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is rather different from the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
It may be, then, that the earlier discussion of deviance delimits a parasitic gap construction.
To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not to be considered in determining a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
Nevertheless, a descriptively adequate grammar raises serious doubts about the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds does not readily tolerate a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
Using 87 phrases consisting of 35 introductory phrases, 18 subject phrases, 17 verb phrases,
and 17 concluding phrases, with each sentence having one of each phrase, randomly picked, this
program will produce over 22 septillion, a bit more precise, 22,084,947,919,456,858,275,840,000
variations of clear and concise paragraphs based upon writing samples of our famous and rather
infamous, Dr. Noam Chomsky.
Most amazing, my program version of this technique in following general guidelines of dubious
rules of language, regardless of tongue, as so well studied and shared by Dr. Chomsky, only
requires a dozen lines of Perl code, setting aside lists of four types of phrases. These phrases
range in number of words length from one word to fifteen words with an average of five words per
phrase. There are no tricks involved in this, other than natural slippery semantics of meaning.
Thank you Kevin McGowan, John Lawler, Anthony Aristar, John F. Sowa, Simon Laven
and my forever friend,
Dr. Noam Chomsky, for helping me to make clarity in concise
communication so very possible.
Read About Dr. Noam Chomsky
