By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory.
It may be, then, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics raises serious doubts about nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case is to be regarded as an abstract underlying order.
Presumably, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is necessary to impose an interpretation on the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
With this clarification, the systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
Using 87 phrases consisting of 35 introductory phrases, 18 subject phrases, 17 verb phrases,
and 17 concluding phrases, with each sentence having one of each phrase, randomly picked, this
program will produce over 22 septillion, a bit more precise, 22,084,947,919,456,858,275,840,000
variations of clear and concise paragraphs based upon writing samples of our famous and rather
infamous, Dr. Noam Chomsky.
Most amazing, my program version of this technique in following general guidelines of dubious
rules of language, regardless of tongue, as so well studied and shared by Dr. Chomsky, only
requires a dozen lines of Perl code, setting aside lists of four types of phrases. These phrases
range in number of words length from one word to fifteen words with an average of five words per
phrase. There are no tricks involved in this, other than natural slippery semantics of meaning.
Thank you Kevin McGowan, John Lawler, Anthony Aristar, John F. Sowa, Simon Laven
and my forever friend,
Dr. Noam Chomsky, for helping me to make clarity in concise
communication so very possible.
Read About Dr. Noam Chomsky
